IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kyle Medvec Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1988-06-16 Country: USA
2006 · Round 4, Pick #102  ·  Minnesota Wild Minnesota Wild
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 3 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2006-07 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 57 4 14 18 0.316 0.1863 0.1889 0.9485 0.9618
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 Vermont D1 HockeyEast SR 29 2 4 6 0.207
2009-10 Vermont D1 HockeyEast JR 39 5 10 15 0.385
2008-09 Vermont D1 HockeyEast SO 39 2 10 12 0.308
2007-08 Vermont D1 HockeyEast FR 30 1 4 5 0.167
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2007-08 · Vermont
-6.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#7219
Defenseman overall
#1005
Defenseman born in 1988
#2755
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Chris Leibinger
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Cutler Martin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Michigan (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Doyle Somerby
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Boston University (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Benning
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Jimmy Mazza
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Canisius (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jackson Leef
Westfield State · 2010-11
0.926 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Cam Boche
Saint John's · 2020-21
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Marinac
SUNY Brockport · 2010-11
0.905 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.