IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jimmy Mazza Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1994-07-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 58 2 8 10 0.172 0.1098 0.1105 0.5166 0.5199
2014-15 P.A.L. Junior Islanders USPHL-Premier-Classic 50 16 33 49 0.980 0.2943 0.2833 0.8072 0.7769
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Canisius D1 AHA SR 36 6 18 24 0.667
2017-18 Canisius D1 AHA JR 38 5 14 19 0.500
2016-17 Canisius D1 AHA SO 30 4 8 12 0.400
2015-16 Canisius D1 AHA FR 37 3 10 13 0.351
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.35
2015-16 · Canisius
+73.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#3391
Defenseman overall
#734
Defenseman born in 1994

D1 Comparables

Casey Nelson
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
John Rey
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Robert Morris (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ty Kraus
Northland · 2015-16
0.760 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Kevin Shand
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2015-16
0.412 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Noel Lortie
Elmira · 2005-06
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.