← New Search ↗ Social Card

Makenna Aure Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-02-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Alexandria Area High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 1 8 9 0.360 0.0544 0.0544
2019-20 Alexandria Area High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 5 8 13 0.520 0.0785 0.0785
2020-21 Alexandria Area High (W) USHS-MN-W 21 4 12 16 0.762 0.1150 0.1150
2021-22 Alexandria Area High (W) USHS-MN-W 24 11 13 24 1.000 0.1510 0.1510
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 WIAC SR 28 14 28 42 1.500
2024-25 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 26 15 14 29 1.115
2023-24 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 31 13 22 35 1.129
2022-23 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 27 11 14 25 0.926
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.93
2022-23 · Wisconsin-River Falls
+772.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
92%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#1985
Defenseman overall
#298
Defenseman born in 2004
#1493
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.04 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Harvard (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Union
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
SDHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Maine (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin ·
0.350 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG
Harvard ·
0.100 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG
Minnesota ·
0.129 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.