← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ellie Newpower Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-12-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Centennial/SLP High (women) USHS-MN-W 23 1 4 5 0.217 0.0328 0.0328
2020-21 Centennial/SLP High (women) USHS-MN-W 16 1 2 3 0.188 0.0283 0.0283
2021-22 Centennial/SLP High (women) USHS-MN-W 27 0 2 2 0.074 0.0112 0.0112
2022-23 Centennial/SLP High (women) USHS-MN-W 30 1 9 10 0.333 0.0503 0.0476
2023-24 Centennial/SLP High (women) USHS-MN-W 28 3 19 22 0.786 0.1186 0.1072
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 St. Michael's College D1 NEWHA 34 1 1 2 0.059
2024-25 St. Michael's College D3 NEWHA FR 30 1 1 2 0.067
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.06
2024-25 · St. Michael's College
-25.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
88%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3724
Defenseman overall
#406
Defenseman born in 2005
#3028
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

USHS-W · 2013-14 · 0.39 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.68 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Union
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.76 PPG
→ North Dakota
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Union (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Saint Mary's · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2014-15
0.208 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint Mary's · 2018-19
0.280 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.