IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kylie Scott Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-12-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 River Cities Blades (women) USHS-MN-W 25 4 4 8 0.320 0.0483 0.0483 — —
2020-21 River Cities Blades (women) USHS-MN-W 19 4 5 9 0.474 0.0715 0.0715 — —
2021-22 River Cities Blades (women) USHS-MN-W 27 5 17 22 0.815 0.1230 0.1230 — —
2022-23 River Cities Blades (women) USHS-MN-W 26 13 14 27 1.038 0.1568 0.1407 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC — 28 10 8 18 0.643
2024-25 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC — 28 3 13 16 0.571
2023-24 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC — 25 4 7 11 0.440
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.44
2023-24 · Gustavus Adolphus
+248.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
85%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#1887
Defenseman overall
#287
Defenseman born in 2004
#1428
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Ebba Strandberg
SDHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Maine (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Kenzie Prater
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.83 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Mekenzie Steffen
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.04 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Allison Roethke
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Quinnipiac
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Kate Hallett
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Harvard (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ebba Strandberg
Maine ·
0.333 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG
Kenzie Prater
Quinnipiac ·
0.432 Strong D
actual D2/3 PPG
Mekenzie Steffen
Wisconsin ·
0.350 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.