← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ebba Strandberg Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-06-22 Country: Sweden
Signed Professionally
Frölunda HC · SDHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 HV71 SDHL 9 0 1 1 0.111 0.1299 0.1299
2013-14 MoDo Hockey SDHL 26 0 2 2 0.077 0.0899 0.0899
2014-15 MoDo Hockey SDHL 25 2 13 15 0.600 0.7017 0.7017
2015-16 MoDo Hockey SDHL 35 1 6 7 0.200 0.2339 0.2339
2020-21 Brynäs IF SDHL 34 1 5 6 0.176 0.2064 0.2064
2021-22 Brynäs IF SDHL 34 0 7 7 0.206 0.2408 0.2408
2023-24 Frölunda HC SDHL 36 1 7 8 0.222 0.2599 0.2176
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Maine D1 35 0 4 4 0.114
2018-19 Maine D1 27 1 2 3 0.111
2017-18 Maine D1 HEA-W SO 30 2 9 11 0.367
2016-17 Maine D1 HEA-W FR 9 0 3 3 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.40
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2016-17 · Maine
-16.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
92%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#624
Defenseman overall
#119
Defenseman born in 1997
#378
in SDHL

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.46 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.16 PPG
→ Boston College (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average D
NCAAe PPG
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Union
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Harvard (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ohio State ·
0.611 Strong D
actual D2/3 PPG
Boston College ·
0.268 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG
Union ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.