IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kate Hallett Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 St. Paul United (W) USHS-MN-W 22 6 6 12 0.545 0.0876 0.0876 — —
2012-13 St. Paul United (W) USHS-MN-W 24 15 11 26 1.083 0.1740 0.1740 — —
2013-14 St. Paul United (W) USHS-MN-W 15 3 7 10 0.667 0.1071 0.1071 — —
2014-15 St. Paul United (W) USHS-MN-W 25 4 21 25 1.000 0.1606 0.1606 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Harvard D1 ECAC-W SR 32 2 1 3 0.094
2017-18 Harvard D1 ECAC-W JR 23 0 3 3 0.130
2016-17 Harvard D1 ECAC-W SO 29 3 2 5 0.172
2015-16 Harvard D1 ECAC-W FR 30 2 1 3 0.100
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.10
2015-16 · Harvard
-23.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#1633
Defenseman overall
#1222
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Mekenzie Steffen
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.04 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Katie Robinson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Grace Bizal
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.16 PPG
→ Boston College (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Kenzie Prater
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.83 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Allison Roethke
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Quinnipiac
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mekenzie Steffen
Wisconsin ·
0.350 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG
Katie Robinson
Minnesota ·
0.129 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG
Grace Bizal
Boston College ·
0.268 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.