← New Search ↗ Social Card

Amy MacDonald Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-12-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Cheyenne Capitals USHS-W 8 0 0 0 0.000
2013-14 Cheyenne Capitals USHS-W 7 0 0 0 0.000
2014-15 Cheyenne Capitals USHS-W 12 1 1 2 0.167 0.0501 0.0501
2015-16 Cheyenne Capitals USHS-W 9 3 0 3 0.333 0.1002 0.1002
2016-17 Cheyenne Capitals USHS-W 16 3 11 14 0.875 0.2631 0.2631
2020-21 Notre Dame Hounds SFMAAAHL-W 4 1 0 1 0.250 0.0585 0.0585
2022-23 Milwaukee Jr. Admirals 19U 19U-AAA-W 51 3 5 8 0.157 0.0534 0.0492
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 26 3 11 14 0.538
2024-25 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 25 1 2 3 0.120
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2024-25 · Milwaukee School of Engineering
-5.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
98%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2326
Defenseman overall
#309
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Boston College
0.05 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG
→ Harvard (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ RIT (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth
0.05 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Princeton (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Boston College ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Harvard ·
0.167 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG
RIT ·
0.143 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.