← Women's Rankings ↗ Social Card

Brinna Dochniak Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-07-14 Country: USA

NCAA-W Projection

Projecting as:

Target Conference:

Show:

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W

0.06

Developing (<0.25)

Base NCAAe-W PPG0.0641

Conf. Strength0.994

Year Adj (FR)×0.80

Confidencehigh

Seasons Used2

NCAA D3W / D2W

Projected PPG — Division Avg

0.25

Developing (<0.35)

Base D3e-W PPG0.2605

Conf. Strength1.000

Year Adj (FR)×0.80

Confidencehigh

Seasons Used2

D1W / D3W Likelihood

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-W PPG	Age-Adjusted
2011-12	Stillwater High (women)	USHS-MN-W	25	0	1	1	0.040	0.0064	0.0064
2012-13	Stillwater High (women)	USHS-MN-W	25	0	6	6	0.240	0.0385	0.0385
2013-14	Stillwater High (women)	USHS-MN-W	25	4	11	15	0.600	0.0964	0.0964
2014-15	Stillwater High (women)	USHS-MN-W	25	6	13	19	0.760	0.1221	0.1221
2019-20	Connecticut Whale	PHF	10	0	2	2	0.200	N/A	N/A

NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent · COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

College Seasons

Season	School	Conference	Year	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG
2018-19	RIT	CHA-W	—	25	1	0	1	0.040
2017-18	RIT	CHA-W	JR	35	1	0	1	0.029
2016-17	RIT	CHA-W	SO	33	1	2	3	0.091
2015-16	RIT	CHA-W	FR	36	1	3	4	0.111

Historical Comparables (NCAA-W)

Player	League · Season · PPG	FR College PPG	School
Taylor Flaherty	USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.76 PPG	0.000	North Dakota
Arianna Kosakowski	NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG	0.000	Union
Ebba Strandberg	SDHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG	0.333	Maine
Allison Roethke	USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG	0.000	Quinnipiac
Emma Turbyville	USHS-W · 2013-14 · 0.39 PPG	0.040	St. Cloud State

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.