← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kaitlyn Ronn Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-01-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Blaine High USHS-MN-W 25 3 12 15 0.600 0.0906 0.0906
2019-20 Blaine High USHS-MN-W 25 4 12 16 0.640 0.0966 0.0966
2020-21 Blaine High USHS-MN-W 19 4 5 9 0.474 0.0715 0.0715
2021-22 Blaine High USHS-MN-W 27 10 15 25 0.926 0.1398 0.1398
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 WIAC SR 30 2 11 13 0.433
2024-25 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 27 2 18 20 0.741
2023-24 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 30 4 16 20 0.667
2022-23 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 26 1 8 9 0.346
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.35
2022-23 · Wisconsin-River Falls
+205.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
90%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2374
Defenseman overall
#344
Defenseman born in 2004
#1818
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

SDHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Maine (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.83 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.04 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Quinnipiac
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 0.39 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Maine ·
0.333 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG
Quinnipiac ·
0.432 Strong D
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin ·
0.350 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.