Based on 40 comparable players
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-20 | Proctor/Hermantown High (W) | USHS-MN-W | 25 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 0.240 | 0.0362 | 0.0362 |
| 2020-21 | Proctor/Hermantown High (W) | USHS-MN-W | 21 | 1 | 18 | 19 | 0.905 | 0.1366 | 0.1366 |
| 2021-22 | Proctor/Hermantown High (W) | USHS-MN-W | 30 | 1 | 8 | 9 | 0.300 | 0.0453 | 0.0453 |
| 2022-23 | Proctor/Hermantown High (W) | USHS-MN-W | 30 | 2 | 8 | 10 | 0.333 | 0.0503 | 0.0455 |
| Season | School | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | St. Scholastica | NCHA | JR | 25 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 0.320 |
| 2024-25 | St. Scholastica | NCHA | SO | 25 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.160 |
| 2023-24 | St. Scholastica | NCHA | FR | 25 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.080 |
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ellie Larson | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG | 0.143 | RIT |
| Sylvie Wallin | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG | 0.333 | Princeton |
| Kate Glover | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG | 0.167 | Harvard |
| Lauren Niska | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG | 0.000 | Minnesota Duluth |
| Brinna Dochniak | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG | 0.111 | RIT |
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julie Barlow | 2024-25 · 0.48 PPG | 0.231 | Concordia (WI) | NCHA |
| Eibhleann Knox | 2024-25 · 0.27 PPG | 0.423 | St. John Fisher | UCHC |
| Katie Sandelin | 2023-24 · 0.29 PPG | — | Nazareth | UCHC |
| Ella Hennes | 2022-23 · 0.85 PPG | 0.125 | Saint Mary's (MN) | MIAC |
| Evie Sellner | 2022-23 · 0.63 PPG | 0.192 | Bethel | MIAC |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.