IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Makenna Kadrlik Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-03-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Farmington High MN (women) USHS-MN-W 23 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2019-20 Farmington High MN (women) USHS-MN-W 25 3 8 11 0.440 0.0664 0.0664 — —
2020-21 Farmington High MN (women) USHS-MN-W 21 6 3 9 0.429 0.0647 0.0647 — —
2021-22 Farmington High MN (women) USHS-MN-W 26 12 28 40 1.538 0.2323 0.2323 — —
2022-23 Farmington High MN (women) USHS-MN-W 26 19 19 38 1.462 0.2207 0.2004 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 WIAC JR 24 1 7 8 0.333
2024-25 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 — — 15 1 3 4 0.267
2023-24 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 — — 16 3 3 6 0.375
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2023-24 · Wisconsin-River Falls
+86.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
85%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#908
Defenseman overall
#155
Defenseman born in 2005
#603
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Dani Sadek
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.38 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Maddie Rolfes
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 0.79 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Grace Bizal
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.16 PPG
→ Boston College (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Arianna Kosakowski
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Union
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Kate Hallett
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Harvard (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Dani Sadek
Ohio State ·
0.611 Strong D
actual D2/3 PPG
Maddie Rolfes
Wisconsin ·
0.323 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG
Grace Bizal
Boston College ·
0.268 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.