IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Teagan Moffat Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Windsor Southwest Wildcats OWHL-U22 30 1 2 3 0.100 0.0350 0.0350 — —
2022-23 Windsor Southwest Wildcats OWHL-U22 40 3 4 7 0.175 0.0613 0.0613 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Aurora D3 NCHA — 26 2 5 7 0.269
2024-25 Aurora D3 NCHA — 27 3 5 8 0.296
2023-24 Aurora D3 NCHA — 25 2 3 5 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2023-24 · Aurora
+317.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
92%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5170
Defenseman overall
#841
in OWHL-U22

D1 Comparables

Abby Ecker
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.42 PPG
→ Bemidji State
0.06 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Jackson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.07 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Lauren Niska
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth
0.05 No data
NCAAe PPG
Paige Michel
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ UConn (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.07 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Tristen Truax
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.07 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Abby Ecker
Bemidji State ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Jordan Jackson
Minnesota State ·
0.130 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG
Lauren Niska
Minnesota Duluth ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.