icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012-13 | Alexandria Area High (W) | USHS-MN-W | 25 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 0.360 | 0.0578 | 0.0578 | — | — |
| 2013-14 | Alexandria Area High (W) | USHS-MN-W | 25 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 0.560 | 0.0899 | 0.0899 | — | — |
| 2014-15 | Alexandria Area High (W) | USHS-MN-W | 23 | 9 | 8 | 17 | 0.739 | 0.1187 | 0.1187 | — | — |
| 2015-16 | Alexandria Area High (W) | USHS-MN-W | 24 | 6 | 15 | 21 | 0.875 | 0.1405 | 0.1405 | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-20 | Wisconsin-Superior | D3 | — | — | 25 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.080 |
| 2018-19 | Wisconsin-Superior | D3 | — | — | 21 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 0.429 |
| 2017-18 | Minnesota Duluth | D1 | WCHA-W | SO | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| 2016-17 | Minnesota Duluth | D1 | WCHA-W | FR | 22 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.