← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Emilija Tuciute Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-05-14 Country: Lithuania
NCAA-W Projection
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.11
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.1134
Conf. Strength0.997
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used1

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.28
Developing (<0.35)
Base D3e-W PPG0.3016
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used1

D1W / D3W Likelihood

10%
NCAA D1W
8%
NCAA D3W
82%
Club / Other

Based on 40 comparable players

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2024-25 OHA Mavericks Tardiff U22 OWHL-U22 28 2 7 9 0.321 0.1126 0.1126
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

College Seasons

SeasonSchoolConferenceYear GPGAPtsPPG
2025-26 Manhattanville UCHC FR 25 1 6 7 0.280

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Taylor Flaherty USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.76 PPG 0.000 North Dakota
Allison Roethke USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG 0.000 Quinnipiac
Briana Jorde USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.68 PPG 0.077 Bemidji State
Emma Turbyville NE-Prep-Girls · 2013-14 · 0.39 PPG 0.040 St. Cloud State
Kenzie Prater USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.83 PPG 0.432 Quinnipiac

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Malia Mckinnon 2022-23 · 1.19 PPG 0.346 Bethel MIAC
Sophie Smith 2024-25 · 1.04 PPG 0.393 Lake Forest NCHA
Greer Hardacre 2023-24 · 1.48 PPG 0.286 Saint Benedict MIAC
Mackenzie Martin 2010-11 · 1.22 PPG 0.333 Middlebury NESCAC
Laine Fischer 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG 0.375 Gustavus Adolphus MIAC

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.