IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cara Mancini Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Worcester Academy USHS-W 30 2 10 12 0.400 0.1203 0.1203 — —
2020-21 Worcester Academy NE-Prep-Girls 3 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 Worcester Academy NE-Prep-Girls 21 5 6 11 0.520 0.3227 0.3227 — —
2022-23 Worcester Academy NE-Prep-Girls 27 11 18 29 1.070 0.6639 0.6639 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Amherst D3 NESCAC — 25 1 5 6 0.240
2024-25 Amherst D3 NESCAC — 30 9 6 15 0.500
2023-24 Amherst D3 NESCAC — 25 2 0 2 0.080
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.49
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.08
2023-24 · Amherst
-83.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

48%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
52%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#1829
Forward overall

D1 Comparables

Jessie Aney
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 4.36 PPG
→ UConn (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.66 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Nicole Guagliardo
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 2.27 PPG
→ Mercyhurst (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.68 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Nicole Schammel
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 4.16 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.63 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Andrea Renner
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 2.00 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.60 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ivy Dynek
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 1.92 PPG
→ St. Cloud State
0.58 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jessie Aney
UConn ·
0.267 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Nicole Guagliardo
Mercyhurst ·
0.156 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Nicole Schammel
Minnesota State ·
0.611 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.