← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kylie Ligday Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-10-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Stillwater High (women) USHS-MN-W 10 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Stillwater High (women) USHS-MN-W 25 4 9 13 0.520 0.0785 0.0785
2020-21 Stillwater High (women) USHS-MN-W 21 3 7 10 0.476 0.0719 0.0719
2021-22 Stillwater High (women) USHS-MN-W 27 2 17 19 0.704 0.1063 0.1063
2022-23 Stillwater High (women) USHS-MN-W 27 5 17 22 0.815 0.1230 0.1089
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC 28 1 5 6 0.214
2024-25 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC 28 2 9 11 0.393
2023-24 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC 25 1 6 7 0.280
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.28
2023-24 · Gustavus Adolphus
+175.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
92%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2436
Defenseman overall
#352
Defenseman born in 2004
#1886
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.76 PPG
→ North Dakota
0.11 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.68 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 0.39 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Quinnipiac
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Union (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

North Dakota ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Bemidji State ·
0.077 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Cloud State ·
0.040 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.