← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kennedi Bielenberg-Howarth Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-10-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Rochester Century/JM High (W) USHS-MN-W 23 1 14 15 0.652 0.0985 0.0985
2019-20 Shattuck St. Mary's 16U USHS-W 45 3 13 16 0.356 0.1069 0.1069
2020-21 Shattuck St. Mary's 16U USHS-W 31 2 10 12 0.387 0.1164 0.1164
2021-22 Shattuck St. Mary's Prep USHS-W 60 2 17 19 0.317 0.0952 0.0952
2022-23 Shattuck St. Mary's Prep USHS-W 53 4 7 11 0.207 0.0624 0.0624
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 WIAC JR 31 1 3 4 0.129
2024-25 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 30 4 6 10 0.333
2023-24 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 26 0 8 8 0.308
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.31
2023-24 · Wisconsin-River Falls
+331.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
88%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3505
Defenseman overall
#447
Defenseman born in 2004

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.42 PPG
→ Bemidji State
0.06 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.07 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ UConn (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.07 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.07 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth
0.05 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bemidji State ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Minnesota State ·
0.130 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG
UConn ·
0.348 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.