← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jaden Kozak Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 St. Francis/North Branch (W) USHS-MN-W 25 1 0 1 0.040 0.0060 0.0060
2020-21 Northern Tier Stars (women) USHS-MN-W 19 2 3 5 0.263 0.0397 0.0397
2021-22 Northern Tier Stars (women) USHS-MN-W 26 3 9 12 0.462 0.0697 0.0697
2022-23 Northern Tier Stars (women) USHS-MN-W 27 3 9 12 0.444 0.0671 0.0671
2023-24 Northern Tier Stars (women) USHS-MN-W 26 14 20 34 1.308 0.1975 0.1975
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Catherine D3 23 0 3 3 0.130
2024-25 St. Catherine D3 24 0 1 1 0.042
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.04
2024-25 · St. Catherine
-66.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
92%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6215
Forward overall
#1421
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.32 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.60 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.32 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.36 PPG
→ Brown (0.63 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.36 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.40 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Minnesota Duluth ·
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Merrimack ·
0.324 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Brown ·
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.