Based on 40 comparable players
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-20 | Okanagan Hockey Acad Vars | CSSHL-U18W | 18 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 0.333 | 0.0764 | 0.0764 |
| 2021-22 | Northern Alberta Xtreme U18 | CSSHL-U18W | 27 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 0.222 | 0.0509 | 0.0509 |
| Season | School | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Manhattanville | UCHC | SR | 25 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.080 |
| 2024-25 | Manhattanville | UCHC | JR | 26 | 1 | 7 | 8 | 0.308 |
| 2023-24 | Manhattanville | UCHC | SO | 27 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 0.333 |
| 2022-23 | Manhattanville | UCHC | FR | 27 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kate Glover | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG | 0.167 | Harvard |
| Lauren Niska | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG | 0.000 | Minnesota Duluth |
| Ellie Larson | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG | 0.143 | RIT |
| Sylvie Wallin | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG | 0.333 | Princeton |
| Abby Ecker | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.42 PPG | 0.000 | Bemidji State |
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ava Johansson | 2022-23 · 1.23 PPG | 0.130 | Wisconsin-Eau Claire | WIAC |
| Lauren Riccobelli | 2024-25 · 0.52 PPG | 0.320 | SUNY Oswego | SUNYAC |
| Macy Peterson | 2022-23 · 0.93 PPG | 0.194 | Post | CHA-W |
| Lily Anderson | 2022-23 · 0.43 PPG | 0.385 | Endicott | NEHC |
| Lauren Hornstein | 2024-25 · 0.40 PPG | — | Hamline | MIAC |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.