IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Aislin Carrick Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-03-12 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 RINK HA Winnipeg U18 Prep CSSHL-U18W 30 1 8 9 0.300 0.0687 0.0637 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wisconsin-Superior D3 — — 27 0 1 1 0.037
2024-25 Wisconsin-Superior D3 — — 17 2 1 3 0.176
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.18
2024-25 · Wisconsin-Superior
+192.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
98%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4112
Defenseman overall
#500
Defenseman born in 2006
#365
in CSSHL-U18W

D1 Comparables

Abby Ecker
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.42 PPG
→ Bemidji State
0.06 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Jackson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.07 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Paige Michel
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ UConn (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.07 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Tristen Truax
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.07 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Kelsey Crow
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Penn State (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.07 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Abby Ecker
Bemidji State ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Jordan Jackson
Minnesota State ·
0.130 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG
Paige Michel
UConn ·
0.348 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.