← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ivy Ray Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-10-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Roseville High USHS-MN-W 9 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Roseville High USHS-MN-W 25 3 2 5 0.200 0.0302 0.0302
2019-20 Roseville High USHS-MN-W 25 4 6 10 0.400 0.0604 0.0604
2020-21 Roseville High USHS-MN-W 20 8 8 16 0.800 0.1208 0.1208
2021-22 Roseville High USHS-MN-W 27 10 5 15 0.556 0.0839 0.0839
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Olaf D3 4 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 St. Olaf D3 3 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 St. Olaf D3 7 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8398
Forward overall
#374
Forward born in 2003
#2350
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.61 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ Cornell (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Minnesota ·
0.257 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Minnesota Duluth ·
0.069 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Cornell ·
0.182 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.