IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Amy Roemer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2007-07-29 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Pilot Mound Academy U18 CSSHL-U18W 25 0 4 4 0.160 0.0367 0.0367 — —
2022-23 Pilot Mound Academy U18 CSSHL-U18W 29 2 4 6 0.207 0.0474 0.0495 — —
2023-24 North Shore Warriors U18 Prep CSSHL-U18W 9 0 2 2 0.222 0.0509 0.0507 — —
2024-25 OHA Mavericks Tardiff U22 OWHL-U22 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Canton D3 SUNYAC FR 9 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
90%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5691
Defenseman overall
#655
Defenseman born in 2007

D1 Comparables

Serena Sommerfield
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Boston College
0.05 No data
NCAAe PPG
Kate Glover
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG
→ Harvard (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Lauren Niska
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth
0.05 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ellie Larson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ RIT (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Sylvie Wallin
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Princeton (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Serena Sommerfield
Boston College ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Kate Glover
Harvard ·
0.167 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG
Lauren Niska
Minnesota Duluth ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.