IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Courtney Rook Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Prior Lake High (women) USHS-MN-W 25 3 0 3 0.120 0.0181 0.0181 — —
2020-21 Prior Lake High (women) USHS-MN-W 5 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2022-23 Prior Lake High (women) USHS-MN-W 26 0 1 1 0.038 0.0058 0.0058 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Aurora D3 NCHA JR 24 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Aurora D3 NCHA — 24 0 2 2 0.083
2023-24 Aurora D3 NCHA — 14 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
92%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8416
Defenseman overall
#8332
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Paige Sorensen
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.09 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.01 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Caroline Buckholtz
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.04 PPG
→ Brown
0.02 No data
NCAAe PPG
Natasha Rachlin
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.04 PPG
→ Harvard (0.09 D1 FR PPG)
0.02 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Hannah Schultz
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Union (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.02 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Anna Erickson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG
→ Vermont (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.02 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Alexa March
Saint Mary's · 2023-24
0.095 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Cody Danychuk
St. Scholastica · 2006-07
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Tegan Konecnik
SUNY Potsdam · 2024-25
0.038 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.