← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cody Danychuk Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1988-08-10 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
Biggar Nationals · SWHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 La Ronge Ice Wolves SJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2006-07 SJHL 55 1 5 6 0.109 0.0280 0.0294
2007-08 Waywayseecappo Wolverines MJHL 60 5 31 36 0.600 0.1155 0.1142
2008-09 Waywayseecappo Wolverines MJHL 60 9 28 37 0.617 0.1187 0.1115
2014-15 Biggar Nationals SWHL 12 2 5 7 0.583
2015-16 Biggar Nationals SWHL 14 7 12 19 1.357
2019-20 Biggar Nationals SWHL 15 2 12 14 0.933
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC SR 26 2 0 2 0.077
2011-12 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC JR 27 0 8 8 0.296
2010-11 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC SO 18 1 1 2 0.111
2009-10 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC FR 6 0 1 1 0.167
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2009-10 · St. Scholastica
+56.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#1866
Defenseman overall
#36
Defenseman born in 1988

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.04 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Harvard (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.83 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.16 PPG
→ Boston College (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Superior · 2006-07
0.609 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Plattsburgh · 2023-24
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Bowdoin · 2007-08
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.