← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kas Kingston Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-05-16 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Notre Dame Hounds SFMAAAHL-W 27 2 7 9 0.333 0.0780 0.0780
2019-20 Notre Dame Hounds SFMAAAHL-W 30 9 16 25 0.833 0.1949 0.1949
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Saint Mary's D3 MIAC SR 23 3 5 8 0.348
2024-25 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC 23 3 5 8 0.348
2023-24 Saint Mary's D3 MIAC JR 23 3 11 14 0.609
2023-24 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC 27 4 11 15 0.556
2022-23 Saint Mary's D3 MIAC SO 25 6 7 13 0.520
2022-23 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC 25 6 7 13 0.520
2021-22 Saint Mary's D3 MIAC FR 25 4 2 6 0.240
2021-22 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC 25 4 2 6 0.240
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.24
2021-22 · Saint Mary's
+259.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5711
Forward overall
#244
Forward born in 2002
#47
in SFMAAAHL-W

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.61 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ Cornell (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.40 PPG
→ Minnesota
0.06 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Minnesota Duluth ·
0.069 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Minnesota ·
0.257 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Cornell ·
0.182 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.