IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nikki Nightengale Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1998-04-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Bloomington Jefferson High (W) USHS-MN-W 22 0 1 1 0.045 0.0069 0.0069 — —
2012-13 Bloomington Jefferson High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 0 5 5 0.200 0.0302 0.0302 — —
2013-14 Bloomington Jefferson High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 5 8 13 0.520 0.0785 0.0785 — —
2014-15 Bloomington Jefferson High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 2 11 13 0.520 0.0785 0.0785 — —
2015-16 Bloomington Jefferson High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 11 7 18 0.720 0.1087 0.1087 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Augsburg D3 MIAC — 27 4 13 17 0.630
2018-19 Augsburg D3 MIAC — 26 13 8 21 0.808
2017-18 Augsburg D3 MIAC — 26 3 7 10 0.385
2016-17 Augsburg D3 MIAC — 27 2 6 8 0.296
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.30
2016-17 · Augsburg
+224.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#2910
Defenseman overall
#288
Defenseman born in 1998
#2285
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Briana Jorde
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.68 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Taylor Flaherty
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.76 PPG
→ North Dakota
0.11 No data
NCAAe PPG
Emma Turbyville
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 0.39 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Cheyenne Harris
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Union (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Taylor Turnquist
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Briana Jorde
Bemidji State ·
0.077 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG
Taylor Flaherty
North Dakota ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Emma Turbyville
St. Cloud State ·
0.040 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.