IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Erica Schramel Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Princeton High USHS-MN-W 25 1 15 16 0.640 0.0966 0.0966 — —
2012-13 Princeton High USHS-MN-W 24 4 10 14 0.583 0.0881 0.0881 — —
2013-14 Princeton High USHS-MN-W 25 12 14 26 1.040 0.1570 0.1570 — —
2014-15 Princeton High USHS-MN-W 25 18 29 47 1.880 0.2839 0.2839 — —
2015-16 Princeton High USHS-MN-W 25 14 23 37 1.480 0.2235 0.2235 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 WIAC SR 27 5 11 16 0.593
2018-19 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 WIAC JR 28 4 13 17 0.607
2017-18 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 WIAC SO 28 5 17 22 0.786
2016-17 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 WIAC FR 25 1 8 9 0.360
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.36
2016-17 · Wisconsin-River Falls
+54.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#598
Defenseman overall
#359
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Dani Sadek
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.46 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Grace Bizal
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.16 PPG
→ Boston College (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Christa Vuglar
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 1.00 PPG
→ RIT (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Anna Kilponen
SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Kate Hallett
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Harvard (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jillian Tabaka
Concordia Wisconsin · 2021-22
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Allie Bussey
St. Scholastica · 2015-16
1.062 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Emily Lemker
Saint Benedict · 2014-15
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.