IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tori Thompson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Rochester J.M./Lourdes USHS-MN-W 24 4 2 6 0.250 0.0377 0.0377 — —
2011-12 Rochester J.M./Lourdes USHS-MN-W 25 7 6 13 0.520 0.0785 0.0785 — —
2012-13 Rochester J.M./Lourdes USHS-MN-W 24 10 8 18 0.750 0.1132 0.1132 — —
2013-14 Rochester J.M./Lourdes USHS-MN-W 24 14 22 36 1.500 0.2265 0.2265 — —
2014-15 Rochester J.M./Lourdes USHS-MN-W 20 16 17 33 1.650 0.2491 0.2491 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 St. Catherine D3 — — 25 4 10 14 0.560
2017-18 St. Catherine D3 — — 25 3 13 16 0.640
2016-17 St. Catherine D3 — — 23 5 11 16 0.696
2015-16 St. Catherine D3 — — 25 0 6 6 0.240
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.24
2015-16 · St. Catherine
+5.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#720
Defenseman overall
#457
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Dani Sadek
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.46 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Christa Vuglar
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 1.00 PPG
→ RIT (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Anna Kilponen
SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Grace Bizal
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.16 PPG
→ Boston College (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Arianna Kosakowski
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Union
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Dani Sadek
Ohio State ·
0.611 Strong D
actual D2/3 PPG
Christa Vuglar
RIT ·
0.205 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG
Anna Kilponen
North Dakota ·
0.257 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.