IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Lexi Muller Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Simley High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 0 3 3 0.120 0.0181 0.0181 — —
2011-12 Simley High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 3 5 8 0.320 0.0483 0.0483 — —
2012-13 Simley High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 7 10 17 0.680 0.1027 0.1027 — —
2013-14 Simley High (W) USHS-MN-W 23 5 5 10 0.435 0.0657 0.0657 — —
2014-15 Simley High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 6 17 23 0.920 0.1389 0.1389 — —
2015-16 Simley High (W) USHS-MN-W 23 15 7 22 0.957 0.1444 0.1444 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 St. Catherine D3 — — 24 3 12 15 0.625
2018-19 St. Catherine D3 — — 25 2 11 13 0.520
2017-18 St. Catherine D3 — — 25 1 8 9 0.360
2016-17 St. Catherine D3 — — 23 4 4 8 0.348
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.35
2016-17 · St. Catherine
+159.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#1926
Defenseman overall
#1464
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Mekenzie Steffen
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.04 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Ebba Strandberg
SDHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Maine (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Kenzie Prater
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.83 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Kate Hallett
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Harvard (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Katie Robinson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mekenzie Steffen
Wisconsin ·
0.350 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG
Ebba Strandberg
Maine ·
0.333 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG
Kenzie Prater
Quinnipiac ·
0.432 Strong D
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.