IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Danny Hobbs Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-06-21 Country: Canada
2007 · Round 7, Pick #198  ·  New York Rangers New York Rangers
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Ohio Blue Jackets USHL 60 10 11 21 0.350 0.2065 0.2199 1.0512 1.1192
2007-08 Ohio Blue Jackets USHL 54 15 16 31 0.574 0.3387 0.3432 1.7243 1.7475
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 UMass D1 HockeyEast SR 32 12 12 24 0.750
2010-11 UMass D1 HockeyEast JR 31 12 16 28 0.903
2009-10 UMass D1 HockeyEast SO 33 3 6 9 0.273
2008-09 UMass D1 HockeyEast FR 24 1 1 2 0.083
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.08
2008-09 · UMass
-66.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#16454
Forward overall
#569
Forward born in 1989
#1584
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Jake Montgomery
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha
0.34 No data
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Steman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.49 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Average
NCAAe PPG
Grant Besse
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jarrid Privitera
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Vermont (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Greenberg
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Miami (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Colin Bella
Lake Forest · 2021-22
0.963 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jason Yuel
Curry · 2005-06
1.769 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Bloom
University of New England · 2010-11
1.654 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.