icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013-14 | Shakopee High (women) | USHS-MN-W | 25 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.040 | 0.0060 | 0.0060 | — | — |
| 2014-15 | Shakopee High (women) | USHS-MN-W | 25 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 0.240 | 0.0362 | 0.0362 | — | — |
| 2015-16 | Shakopee High (women) | USHS-MN-W | 25 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 0.200 | 0.0302 | 0.0302 | — | — |
| 2016-17 | Shakopee High (women) | USHS-MN-W | 25 | 5 | 14 | 19 | 0.760 | 0.1148 | 0.1148 | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-21 | Saint Benedict | D3 | — | — | 9 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.111 |
| 2019-20 | Saint Benedict | D3 | — | — | 24 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 0.417 |
| 2018-19 | Saint Benedict | D3 | — | — | 23 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0.130 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.