IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Taylor Flaherty Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-01-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Lakeville North High USHS-MN-W 25 0 3 3 0.120 0.0193 0.0193 — —
2011-12 Lakeville North High USHS-MN-W 25 9 8 17 0.680 0.1092 0.1092 — —
2012-13 Lakeville North High USHS-MN-W 25 11 8 19 0.760 0.1221 0.1221 — —
2013-14 Lakeville North High USHS-MN-W 22 7 7 14 0.636 0.1022 0.1022 — —
2014-15 Lakeville North High USHS-MN-W 25 9 12 21 0.840 0.1349 0.1349 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Vermont D1 — — 35 3 8 11 0.314
2017-18 Vermont D1 HEA-W JR 26 4 4 8 0.308
2016-17 North Dakota D1 — — 15 1 1 2 0.133
2015-16 North Dakota D1 — — 24 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#2186
Defenseman overall
#211
Defenseman born in 1996
#1669
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Kenzie Prater
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.83 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Allison Roethke
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Quinnipiac
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ebba Strandberg
SDHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Maine (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Arianna Kosakowski
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Union
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Emma Turbyville
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 0.39 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kenzie Prater
Quinnipiac ·
0.432 Strong D
actual D2/3 PPG
Allison Roethke
Quinnipiac ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Ebba Strandberg
Maine ·
0.333 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.