IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Emma Turbyville Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Loyola Academy USHS-W 14 7 4 11 0.786 0.2287 0.2287 — —
2011-12 Shattuck St. Mary's 16U USHS-W 53 6 16 22 0.415 0.1208 0.1208 — —
2012-13 Shattuck St. Mary's 16U USHS-W 61 5 12 17 0.279 0.0811 0.0811 — —
2013-14 Shattuck St. Mary's Prep USHS-W 31 4 8 12 0.387 0.1127 0.1127 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 St. Cloud State D1 WCHA-W SR 33 0 11 11 0.333
2016-17 St. Cloud State D1 WCHA-W JR 35 1 4 5 0.143
2015-16 St. Cloud State D1 WCHA-W SO 25 0 0 0 0.000
2014-15 St. Cloud State D1 WCHA-W FR 25 0 1 1 0.040
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.04
2014-15 · St. Cloud State
-57.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#2674
Defenseman overall
#2641
in USHS-W

D1 Comparables

Briana Jorde
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.68 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Taylor Flaherty
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.76 PPG
→ North Dakota
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Cheyenne Harris
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Union (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Taylor Turnquist
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Arianna Kosakowski
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Union
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Briana Jorde
Bemidji State ·
0.077 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG
Taylor Flaherty
North Dakota ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Cheyenne Harris
Union ·
0.324 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.