IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ashley Marchant Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Anaheim Lady Ducks 16U AAA 16U-AAA-W 30 3 4 7 0.233 0.1046 0.1046 — —
2016-17 Anaheim Lady Ducks 16U AAA 16U-AAA-W 57 7 16 23 0.404 0.1809 0.1809 — —
2017-18 Anaheim Lady Ducks 19U AAA 19U-AAA-W 39 0 4 4 0.103 0.0349 0.0349 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Chatham D3 UCHC — 25 1 10 11 0.440
2021-22 Chatham D3 UCHC — 16 0 3 3 0.188
2020-21 Chatham D3 UCHC — 6 1 4 5 0.833
2019-20 Chatham D3 UCHC — 25 1 8 9 0.360
2018-19 Chatham D3 UCHC — 25 0 2 2 0.080
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.08
2018-19 · Chatham
-9.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
85%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3224
Defenseman overall

D1 Comparables

Serena Sommerfield
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Boston College
0.04 No data
NCAAe PPG
Heather Olson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brinna Dochniak
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ RIT (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Grace Bowlby
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Xylia Lang
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Lindenwood (0.09 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Alexis Larsen
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2024-25
0.083 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Preston Gabriel
SUNY Cortland · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Sadie Long
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2016-17
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.