IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sophia Marra Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Washington Pride 19U AAA JWHL-U19 25 4 5 9 0.360 0.1351 0.1351 — —
2016-17 Washington Pride 19U AAA JWHL-U19 24 4 4 8 0.333 0.1251 0.1251 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC JR 23 5 1 6 0.261
2018-19 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC SO 17 1 0 1 0.059
2017-18 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC FR 23 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#7227
Forward overall
#236
in JWHL-U19

D1 Comparables

Kippin Keller
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.68 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sierra Semmel
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Maine
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Mac Johnson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Abby Halluska
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Rebecca Freiburger
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jenna Curtis
Wisconsin-Superior · 2016-17
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Ellie Woodman
Concordia (WI) · 2011-12
0.360 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Abbey Hardwick
Concordia · 2018-19
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.