IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sophia Gorski Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Lakeville North High USHS-MN-W 8 1 0 1 0.125 0.0189 0.0189 — —
2016-17 Lakeville North High USHS-MN-W 25 4 0 4 0.160 0.0242 0.0242 — —
2017-18 Lakeville North High USHS-MN-W 24 2 1 3 0.125 0.0189 0.0189 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 St. Catherine D3 — — 25 11 7 18 0.720
2019-20 St. Catherine D3 — — 24 10 8 18 0.750
2018-19 St. Catherine D3 — — 25 0 1 1 0.040
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.02
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.04
2018-19 · St. Catherine
+122.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
98%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15155
Forward overall
#6889
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Stella Haberman
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ RIT (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.02 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Anna Johnson
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 0.05 PPG
→ Mercyhurst (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.02 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Amber Moore
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 0.05 PPG
→ Cornell (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.01 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Olivia Arkell
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Minnesota
0.02 No data
NCAAe PPG
Haley Mullins
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.04 PPG
→ Harvard (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.02 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Stella Haberman
RIT ·
0.125 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Anna Johnson
Mercyhurst ·
0.027 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Amber Moore
Cornell ·
0.133 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.