IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Emma Faso Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Amherst/Sweet Home/Clarence USHS-W 22 25 26 51 2.318 0.6971 0.6971 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 William Smith D3 — SR 17 6 2 8 0.471
2022-23 William Smith D3 — JR 18 6 5 11 0.611
2021-22 William Smith D3 — SO 16 5 0 5 0.312
2020-21 William Smith D3 — FR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Plattsburgh D3 — FR 17 0 1 1 0.059
2019-20 Plattsburgh State D3 — — 17 0 1 1 0.059
2019-20 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — — 17 0 1 1 0.059
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.65
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.06
2019-20 · Plattsburgh
-90.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#260
Forward overall
#65
in USHS-W

D1 Comparables

Nicole Guagliardo
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 2.27 PPG
→ Mercyhurst (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.68 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jessie Aney
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 4.36 PPG
→ UConn (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.66 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Katie Detert
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 2.50 PPG
→ St. Cloud State
0.75 No data
NCAAe PPG
Nicole Schammel
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 4.16 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.63 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Aly Tremblay
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 2.61 PPG
→ RPI (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.78 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nicole Guagliardo
Mercyhurst ·
0.156 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jessie Aney
UConn ·
0.267 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Katie Detert
St. Cloud State ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.