IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Georgia Bailey Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-03-17 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Stanstead College Varsity (W) CAHS-W 0 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2022-23 Northwood School JWHL-U19 20 11 11 22 1.100 0.3659 0.3504 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 RPI D1 ECAC-W JR 35 5 10 15 0.429
2024-25 RPI D1 ECAC-W SO 35 7 12 19 0.543
2023-24 RPI D1 ECAC-W FR 35 2 6 8 0.229
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.30
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.23
2023-24 · RPI
-23.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
62%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#1393
Forward overall
#39
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Karlie Lund
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.17 PPG
→ Princeton (1.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Carly Bullock
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.20 PPG
→ Princeton (0.81 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Haley Mack
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.16 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Emily Bergland
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.16 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Corbin Boyd
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.16 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Karlie Lund
Princeton ·
1.182 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Carly Bullock
Princeton ·
0.812 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Haley Mack
Bemidji State ·
0.371 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.