IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Pénélope Lavoie Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2007-11-12 Country: Canada Height: 5'9" (175 cm) Weight: 148 lbs (67 kg)
2026 NHL Draft Eligible
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Stanstead College Varsity (W) CAHS-W 61 8 20 28 0.459 0.1647 0.1692 — —
2024-25 Stanstead College Varsity (W) CAHS-W 66 14 24 38 0.576 0.2066 0.2055 — —
2025-26 Stanstead College Varsity (W) CAHS-W 62 17 48 65 1.048 0.3762 0.3592 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
72%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#474
Defenseman overall
#74
Defenseman born in 2007
#43
in CAHS-W

D1 Comparables

Taylor Marchin
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG
→ Yale (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Anna Wright
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
Lauren Kelly
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Dartmouth (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Anna Kilponen
SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Briana Mastel
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 1.04 PPG
→ Harvard (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brynn Puppe
Williams · 2016-17
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Mollie Johnson
Neumann · 2012-13
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Amber Heidenreich
Wisconsin-Superior · 2015-16
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.