Alvernia
Set Commitment
NCAA Division I Women's
Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.06
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.0611
Conf. Strength0.997
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencemedium
Seasons Used2
NCAA D3W
Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.15
Developing (<0.35)
Base D3e-W PPG0.1602
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencemedium
Seasons Used2
D1W / D3W Likelihood
2%
NCAA D1W
18%
NCAA D3W
80%
Club / Other
Based on 40 comparable players
Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG
Pre-College Seasons
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-25 | — | 19U-AAA-W | 41 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 0.195 | 0.0801 | 0.0801 |
| 2025-26 | Washington Pride 19U AAA | JWHL-U19 | 16 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.125 | 0.0485 | 0.0485 |
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent · COVID-flagged seasons in yellow
Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ellie Larson | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG | 0.143 | RIT |
| Kate Glover | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG | 0.167 | Harvard |
| Lauren Niska | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG | 0.000 | Minnesota Duluth |
| Sylvie Wallin | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG | 0.333 | Princeton |
| Brinna Dochniak | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG | 0.111 | RIT |
Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amanda Smythe | 2024-25 · 1.16 PPG | 0.105 | Wisconsin-River Falls | WIAC |
| Kaitlin Roberts | 2023-24 · 0.31 PPG | — | Gustavus Adolphus | MIAC |
| Kellsey Kludt | 2024-25 · 0.68 PPG | 0.200 | St. Olaf | MIAC |
| Madison McCullough | 2022-23 · 0.32 PPG | — | Wisconsin-Superior | WIAC |
| Karin Knapp | 2015-16 · 0.29 PPG | — | Wisconsin-Eau Claire | WIAC |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.