IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Morrison Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-10-23 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Spruce Grove Saints AJHL 9 0 1 1 0.111 0.0373 0.0428 — —
2012-13 Vancouver Giants WHL 64 2 19 21 0.328 0.1596 0.1709 0.8051 0.8623
2013-14 Vancouver Giants WHL 65 6 17 23 0.354 0.1721 0.1759 0.8681 0.8873
2014-15 — WHL 66 4 9 13 0.197 0.0958 0.0932 0.4834 0.4705
2015-16 — AJHL 46 6 22 28 0.609 0.2042 0.1928 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Northland D1 — SO 1 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Northland D1 — FR 6 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#9749
Defenseman overall
#1419
Defenseman born in 1995

D1 Comparables

Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jon Marzec
Wisconsin-Stout · 2015-16
0.316 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Frost
Castleton · 2009-10
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nate Miller
Hamilton · 1995-96
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.