icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 | Upper Fox Valley | USHS-W | 19 | 8 | 13 | 21 | 1.105 | 0.3218 | 0.3295 | — | — |
| 2011-12 | Upper Fox Valley | USHS-W | 9 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 0.667 | 0.1941 | 0.1904 | — | — |
| 2012-13 | Upper Fox Valley | USHS-W | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2013-14 | Upper Fox Valley | USHS-W | 5 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 1.000 | 0.2911 | 0.2587 | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-19 | RIT | D1 | CHA-W | — | 24 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.083 |
| 2017-18 | RIT | D1 | CHA-W | SR | 5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.200 |
| 2016-17 | RIT | D1 | CHA-W | JR | 28 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.107 |
| 2015-16 | RIT | D1 | CHA-W | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| 2014-15 | RIT | D1 | CHA-W | FR | 39 | 1 | 7 | 8 | 0.205 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.