IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jane Hannula Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Coon Rapids High USHS-W 25 1 4 5 0.200 0.0601 0.0601 — —
2011-12 Coon Rapids High USHS-W 25 8 4 12 0.480 0.1443 0.1443 — —
2012-13 Coon Rapids High USHS-W 24 8 11 19 0.792 0.2381 0.2381 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC SR 25 6 1 7 0.280
2015-16 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC JR 26 7 2 9 0.346
2014-15 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC SO 26 4 3 7 0.269
2013-14 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC FR 25 4 4 8 0.320
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.32
2013-14 · Saint Mary's (MN)
+86.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#5118
Forward overall
#1766
in USHS-W

D1 Comparables

Sara Hjalmarsson
SDHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Providence (0.66 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Jacqueline Kaasa
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.46 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Mariah Gardner
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.40 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Abby Halluska
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.40 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Gabby Billing
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.40 PPG
→ Dartmouth (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

McKenzie Rich
Franklin Pierce · 2021-22
0.219 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Megan Dulong
Wisconsin-Superior · 2015-16
0.407 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Bailey Olson
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2016-17
0.407 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.