IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Maddie Crowley-Cahill Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2000-11-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 New Hampton School USHS-W 30 2 3 5 0.167 0.0485 0.0446 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Merrimack D1 HEA-W — 32 1 6 7 0.219
2024-25 New Hampshire D1 HEA-W GR 35 2 1 3 0.086
2022-23 Boston College D1 HEA-W SR 34 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Boston College D1 HEA-W JR 34 5 6 11 0.324
2020-21 Boston College D1 HEA-W SO 20 0 3 3 0.150
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.04
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.15
2020-21 · Boston College
+256.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
85%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5221
Defenseman overall
#392
Defenseman born in 2000
#3997
in USHS-W

D1 Comparables

Sylvie Wallin
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Princeton (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Ellie Larson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ RIT (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Paige Michel
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ UConn (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Brinna Dochniak
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ RIT (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Grace Bowlby
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Sylvie Wallin
Princeton ·
0.333 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG
Ellie Larson
RIT ·
0.143 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG
Paige Michel
UConn ·
0.348 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.