IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Rylie Jones Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-07-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Cushing Academy USHS-W 34 0 14 14 0.412 0.1199 0.1199 — —
2021-22 Cushing Academy USHS-W 27 0 5 5 0.185 0.0539 0.0515 — —
2022-23 Cushing NE-Prep-Girls 32 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Northeastern D1 HEA-W JR 39 3 13 16 0.410
2024-25 Northeastern D1 HEA-W SO 23 0 4 4 0.174
2023-24 Northeastern D1 HEA-W FR 38 0 6 6 0.158
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.16
2023-24 · Northeastern
+209.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
90%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6018
Defenseman overall
#605
Defenseman born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Paige Michel
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ UConn (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Ellie Larson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ RIT (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Kate Glover
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG
→ Harvard (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Lauren Niska
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth
0.06 No data
NCAAe PPG
Sylvie Wallin
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Princeton (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Paige Michel
UConn ·
0.348 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG
Ellie Larson
RIT ·
0.143 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG
Kate Glover
Harvard ·
0.167 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.