IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kailey Smith Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-03-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Deerfield NE-Prep-Girls 25 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2019-20 Cushing Academy USHS-W 34 5 8 13 0.382 0.1113 0.1113 — —
2021-22 Cushing NE-Prep-Girls 27 3 4 7 0.260 0.1196 0.1196 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Sacred Heart D1 NEWHA SR 35 1 3 4 0.114
2024-25 Sacred Heart D1 NEWHA JR 38 1 10 11 0.289
2023-24 Sacred Heart D1 NEWHA SO 38 3 4 7 0.184
2022-23 Sacred Heart D1 NEWHA FR 36 3 11 14 0.389
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.39
2022-23 · Sacred Heart
+244.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
92%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#1998
Defenseman overall
#296
Defenseman born in 2004
#438
in NE-Prep-Girls

D1 Comparables

Taylor Flaherty
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.76 PPG
→ North Dakota
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Arianna Kosakowski
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Union
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Emma Turbyville
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 0.39 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Ebba Strandberg
SDHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Maine (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Allison Roethke
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Quinnipiac
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Taylor Flaherty
North Dakota ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Arianna Kosakowski
Union ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Emma Turbyville
St. Cloud State ·
0.040 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.