IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Katie Robinson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-10-08 Country: USA
Signed Professionally
TPS · SMLIIGA-W

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Dodge County High (W) USHS-MN-W 24 1 5 6 0.250 0.0401 0.0401 — —
2011-12 Dodge County High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 4 20 24 0.960 0.1542 0.1542 — —
2012-13 Dodge County High (W) USHS-MN-W 24 4 22 26 1.083 0.1740 0.1740 — —
2013-14 Dodge County High (W) USHS-MN-W 23 3 4 7 0.304 0.0489 0.0489 — —
2014-15 Dodge County High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 11 25 36 1.440 0.2313 0.2313 — —
2015-16 Dodge County High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 13 26 39 1.560 0.2505 0.2505 — —
2020-21 TPS SMLIIGA-W 21 3 11 14 0.667 0.2528 0.2528 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W — 36 3 0 3 0.083
2018-19 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W — 22 2 1 3 0.136
2017-18 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W SO 32 2 2 4 0.125
2016-17 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W FR 31 3 1 4 0.129
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.13
2016-17 · Minnesota
-43.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#561
Defenseman overall
#113
Defenseman born in 1997

D1 Comparables

Dani Sadek
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.46 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Anna Kilponen
SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Christa Vuglar
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 1.00 PPG
→ RIT (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Grace Bizal
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.16 PPG
→ Boston College (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Kate Hallett
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Harvard (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Dani Sadek
Ohio State ·
0.611 Strong D
actual D2/3 PPG
Anna Kilponen
North Dakota ·
0.257 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG
Christa Vuglar
RIT ·
0.205 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.