IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alexis Paddington Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-04-03 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
MoDo Hockey · SDHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 MoDo Hockey SDHL 12 4 2 6 0.500 0.5775 0.6044 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W SR 32 13 9 22 0.688
2024-25 Minnesota State D1 CHA-W SR 32 13 9 22 0.688
2023-24 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W JR 34 4 9 13 0.382
2023-24 Minnesota State D1 CHA-W JR 34 4 9 13 0.382
2022-23 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W SO 35 9 11 20 0.571
2022-23 Minnesota State D1 CHA-W SO 35 9 10 19 0.543
2021-22 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W FR 33 6 8 14 0.424

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
95%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#417
Forward overall
#9
Forward born in 2003
#140
in SDHL

D1 Comparables

Lauren Abbenante
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 1.30 PPG
→ Holy Cross (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.60 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Andrea Renner
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 2.00 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.58 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Phoebe Staenz
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 1.38 PPG
→ Yale (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.63 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Bridget Carey
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 1.38 PPG
→ Brown (0.36 D1 FR PPG)
0.63 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ivy Dynek
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 1.92 PPG
→ St. Cloud State
0.56 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lauren Abbenante
Holy Cross ·
0.607 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrea Renner
Northeastern ·
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Phoebe Staenz
Yale ·
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.