IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Emma Pais Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-07-11 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 London Devilettes OWHL-U22 29 16 21 37 1.276 0.4461 0.4461 — —
2022-23 London Devilettes OWHL-U22 36 31 24 55 1.528 0.5341 0.5341 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Colgate D1 ECAC-W — 36 18 14 32 0.889
2024-25 Colgate D1 ECAC-W — 39 19 19 38 0.974
2023-24 Colgate D1 ECAC-W — 40 18 16 34 0.850
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.43
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.85
2023-24 · Colgate
+99.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
60%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#656
Forward overall
#16
Forward born in 2005
#19
in OWHL-U22

D1 Comparables

Saana Valkama
SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 1.43 PPG
→ Vermont (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.54 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Katie Detert
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 1.80 PPG
→ St. Cloud State
0.52 No data
NCAAe PPG
Annie Roche
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 1.88 PPG
→ Colgate
0.55 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ivy Dynek
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 1.78 PPG
→ St. Cloud State
0.52 No data
NCAAe PPG
Nicole Schammel
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 3.44 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.55 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Saana Valkama
Vermont ·
0.314 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Katie Detert
St. Cloud State ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Annie Roche
Colgate ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.